<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Humanities &#8211; Something of Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.somethingofinterest.com/category/something-of-interest-info-database-entries/humanities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com</link>
	<description>Random stuff I find interesting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 15:20:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Are you using &#8220;steep learning curve&#8221; wrong?</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/are-you-using-steep-learning-curve-wrong/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/are-you-using-steep-learning-curve-wrong/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 14:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stephen Dubner&#8217;s Freakonomics podcast episode pointed out that using the term &#8220;steep learning curve&#8221; to describe something that is difficult to master is incorrect. I&#8217;ve been guilty of this and now notice I&#8217;m not the only one. Within a day or so, I heard another person on a different podcast use the term incorrectly. From [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Dubner&#8217;s Freakonomics podcast episode pointed out that using the term &#8220;steep learning curve&#8221; to describe something that is difficult to master is incorrect. I&#8217;ve been guilty of this and now notice I&#8217;m not the only one. Within a day or so, I heard another person on a different podcast use the term incorrectly.</p>
<p>From the <a href="http://freakonomics.com/podcast/misused-psychology-terms/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">transcript</a>:</p>
<p>Stephen Dubner is interviewing Scott Lilienfeld, a professor of psychology at Emory University.</p>
<p>DUBNER: And the last one weâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />ll do right now is â€œsteep learning curve.â€</p>
<p>LILIENFELD: A lot of people will say, â€œOh, I started on a new job where I was having to do something new. And this job has a really steep learning curve.â€ In fact theyâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />re getting it backward. A steep learning curve is easy. Because a steep learning curve means â€”</p>
<p>DUBNER: You learn a lot in a hurry, right?</p>
<p>LILIENFELD: Not slowly.</p>
<p>DUBNER: When I read that in your paper I thought, â€œOh my goodness, thatâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s really interesting that weâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />ve all got it backwards.â€ But then I quickly rationalized and said, â€œWell, I guess what I always assumed was that the steepness was on the axis referring to difficulty somehow,â€ right? And that if a task is particularly difficult, then thatâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s the steepness, and thatâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s the curve Iâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />m on. So really, when we encounter something thatâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s really difficult, and weâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />re having a hard time mastering it, we should say weâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />re on a very shallow â€”</p>
<p>LILIENFELD: A very shallow learning curve, thatâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s right. I think when people say, â€œThis task has a steep learning curve,â€ what they mean is, â€œMan, I feel like Iâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />m going up like Sisyphus pushing the rock up the hill and going up a very steep mountain!â€ But in fact if something has a steep learning curve, that means that itâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s acquired very quickly.</p>
<p>Listen to the episode <a href="http://freakonomics.com/podcast/misused-psychology-terms/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/are-you-using-steep-learning-curve-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stand Up To Prevent Drowning</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/stand-up-to-prevent-drowning/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/stand-up-to-prevent-drowning/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOI Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In episode one of the Undisclosed podcast about the case of State v. Pamela Lanier, drowning expert John Fletemeyer states that in 40 to 50 percent of open water drownings the water is not over the victims head. Fletemeyer advises rescue workers to yell at drowning victims to just &#8220;stand up!&#8221; Another interesting statistic from [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><figure id="attachment_438" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-438" style="width: 150px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" src="http://www.somethingofinterest.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/drowning_1525701176-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-438" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-438" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://pixabay.com/users/geralt/">geralt</a> / Pixabay</figcaption></figure>In episode one of the <a href="http://undisclosed-podcast.com/episodes/pamela-lanier/episode-1.html">Undisclosed podcast</a> about the case of State v. Pamela Lanier, drowning expert John Fletemeyer states that in 40 to 50 percent of open water drownings the water is not over the victims head. Fletemeyer advises rescue workers to yell at drowning victims to just &#8220;stand up!&#8221; </p>
<p>Another interesting statistic from this <a href="https://www.wlsl.org/WLSL/The_Event/Drowning_Data/WLSL/Drowning_Data.aspx?hkey=7f1070a1-83e1-4c58-857d-ea086b4ae231">website</a>, is that 80% of drowning victims in the United States are male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/stand-up-to-prevent-drowning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Law Weirdness</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/copyright-law-weirdness/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/copyright-law-weirdness/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOI Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a big proponent of limited copyright law. I think copyright should have a limited time limit, after which time the work or IP falls into the public domain to be used freely. Currently copyright seems to go on forever. As ranted about by CGP Grey here. But recently, I discovered that terrestrial or over [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big proponent of limited copyright law. I think copyright should have a limited time limit, after which time the work or IP falls into the public domain to be used freely. Currently copyright seems to go on forever. As ranted about by CGP Grey <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk862BbjWx4">here</a>.</p>
<p>But recently, I discovered that terrestrial or over the air broadcasters only paid the song writers and publishers for playing recorded music. The ones performing the song don&#8217;t get anything when their record is played. A loophole the broadcasters have consistently lobbied for.</p>
<p>For instance:<br />
&#8220;When you hear Counting Crowsâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> recording of â€˜Big Yellow Taxiâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> on the radio in the US, Joni Mitchell â€“ the composer of â€˜Big Yellow Taxiâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> â€“ is compensated through BMI.  But Counting Crows receive nothing for this performance.&#8221;</p>
<p>More can be found in this article:<br />
<a href="http://futureofmusic.org/article/fact-sheet/public-performance-right-sound-recordings">Public Performance Right for Sound Recordings</a></p>
<p><iframe title="A Fair(y) Use Tale (captioned)" width="580" height="435" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BeKFAM892k4?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/copyright-law-weirdness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Billion People</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/7-billion-people/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/7-billion-people/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The world&#8217;s population today is about 7 Billion. Sounds like a lot. Is that too many people for this planet? What if all 7 Billion people stood in one place shoulder to shoulder, would it fill up a whole country? a state? Really, only one large city, Los Angeles, CA to be exact. Just 500 [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world&#8217;s population today is about 7 Billion. Sounds like a lot. Is that too many people for this planet? What if all 7 Billion people stood in one place shoulder to shoulder, would it fill up a whole country? a state? Really, only one large city, Los Angeles, CA to be exact. Just 500 square miles.</p>
<p><iframe title="What If Everyone JUMPED At Once?" width="580" height="326" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jHbyQ_AQP8c?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/10/111031-population-7-billion-earth-world-un-seven/">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/10/111031-population-7-billion-earth-world-un-seven/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/7-billion-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Amount Spent on Alcohol has not changed in 30 years.</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/us-amount-spent-on-alcohol-has-not-changed-in-30-years/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/us-amount-spent-on-alcohol-has-not-changed-in-30-years/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NPR&#8217;s money blog ran an interesting graphic about how Americans spend their booze money compared with 30 years ago. The average spent has not changed, about one dollar of every 100. But what&#8217;s changed is where it&#8217;s bought and what type. NPR Money Blog]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR&#8217;s money blog ran an interesting graphic about how Americans spend their booze money compared with 30 years ago. The average spent has not changed, about one dollar of every 100. But what&#8217;s changed is where it&#8217;s bought and what type.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/06/19/155366716/what-america-spends-on-booze" title="Planet Money">NPR Money Blog</a></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" src="http://www.npr.org/news/graphics/2012/06/pm_booze/gr-pm-booze-462_home2.jpg" class="aligncenter" width="462" height="450" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/us-amount-spent-on-alcohol-has-not-changed-in-30-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Acapella cover of the song Africa</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/great-acapella-cover-of-the-song-africa/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/great-acapella-cover-of-the-song-africa/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while you come across something creative and unique and this is one of those times:]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while you come across something creative and unique and this is one of those times:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yjbpwlqp5Qw&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yjbpwlqp5Qw&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/great-acapella-cover-of-the-song-africa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>10,000 Hours to become a Master</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/10000-hours-to-become-a-master/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/10000-hours-to-become-a-master/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s book &#8220;Outliers&#8221; he states research suggests that it takes 10,000 hours to become a master at something. He relates how well know &#8220;masters&#8221; put in the extra practice time to help them make it to the top. And they did not achieve that place until they had first accomplished at least 10,000 [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s book &#8220;Outliers&#8221; he states research suggests that it takes 10,000 hours to become a master at something. He relates how well know &#8220;masters&#8221; put in the extra practice time to help them make it to the top. And they did not achieve that place until they had first accomplished at least 10,000 hours. Which is roughly three hours a day for ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/10000-hours-to-become-a-master/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skid Row origins</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/skid-row-origins/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/skid-row-origins/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 03:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The term &#8220;skid row&#8221; takes its name from the run-down saloons and boarding houses near the skid roads of western logging camps. Source &#8211; Modern Marvels Episode: Logging Tech A skid road was a corduroy road made of logs, used to skid or drag felled trees through the woods or bog to the saw mill.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The term &#8220;skid row&#8221; takes its name from the run-down saloons and boarding houses near the skid roads of western logging camps. </p></blockquote>
<p>Source &#8211; Modern Marvels Episode: Logging Tech</p>
<p>A skid road was a corduroy road made of logs, used to skid or drag felled trees through the woods or bog to the saw mill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/skid-row-origins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subliminal Advertising was a hoax</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/subliminal-advertising-was-a-hoax/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/subliminal-advertising-was-a-hoax/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[According to Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media ecology at New York University, the original revelation of subliminal advertising effects was a hoax. In 1957, an enterprising marketing researcher named James Vicary announced to a breathless world that he had conducted an experiment in a movie theater in Fort Lee, New Jersey during screenings [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media ecology at New York University, the original revelation of subliminal advertising effects was a hoax.</p>
<blockquote><p>In 1957, an enterprising marketing researcher named James Vicary announced to a breathless world that he had conducted an experiment in a movie theater in Fort Lee, New Jersey during screenings of the William Holden picture, Picnic. Vicary claimed that what he had done was to flash subliminal inducements during the screening of the film telling people to drink Coca Cola or to eat popcorn. His claim was that those subliminal flashes had actually increased sales of those items at the concession stand in the theater by some 38 percent.</p>
<p>This announcement took the country by [LAUGHING] storm. People basically freaked out over it. The networks swore they would never engage in practices like this. The New York State Senate passed a law against this kind of thing. Aldous Huxley appeared on The Mike Wallace Show [LAUGHS] and referred to it as something far worse than anything he&#8217;d imagined in Brave New World. It was quite a to do.</p>
<p>And the irony is that it turned out that Vicary had made the whole thing up.</p></blockquote>
<p><object width="350" height="36"><param name="movie" value="http://onthemedia.org/flashplayer/mp3player.swf?config=http://onthemedia.org/flashplayer/config_share.xml&#038;file=http://onthemedia.org/stream/xspf/90489"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://onthemedia.org/flashplayer/mp3player.swf?config=http://onthemedia.org/flashplayer/config_share.xml&#038;file=http://onthemedia.org/stream/xspf/90489" id="OTM_Mp3_Player_90489" name="OTM_Mp3_Player_90489" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" wmode="transparent" height="36" width="350"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/subliminal-advertising-was-a-hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert A. Heinlein Quote</title>
		<link>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/robert-a-heinlein-quote/</link>
					<comments>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/robert-a-heinlein-quote/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingofinterest.com/?p=107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.<br />
-Lazarus Long, <em>Time Enough For Love</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.somethingofinterest.com/robert-a-heinlein-quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
